"Dick" Offers Up Advice On Saving State From Fiscal Morass
In financial circles, when Richard Ravitch -- often credited with saving NYC from default -- speaks, governmental authorities typically stop and listen.
So when the Lieutenant Governor offered up a 5-year plan to salvage New York's sagging economy, folks stopped and took note.
Among the proposals placed on the table (though not altogether palatable) are:
- The paydown of the existing budget gap within 5 years;
- Creation of an independent financial review board;
- Borrowing by the State, within stringent guidelines, and conditioned upon a limited timeframe for repayment.
What? More borrowing? Isn't that what got New York into this deep hole in the first place? Ahhh. Till debt do us part...
Okay. All municipalities borrow. You can't operate government, or so it would seem, without at least a modicum of debt. [Why not?]
The Ravitch treatise is a long one. Sometimes well reasoned. Other times, rambling.
Greater oversight. Less spending. Prudent accounting. Transparent accountability. All good.
But what of the burden of property taxes, that keeps New York's economy from growing, and NYers constantly owing? How about reducing the size and scope of government? [Consolidation, anyone?] And what about spending no more than the Empire State actually has on hand -- as in, no more borrowing?
No, we guess you can't expect the State of New York to be run like a fiscally prudent household. [Why not?]
John Faso, late of GOP candidacy for governor and currently hobnobbing with New Yorkers For Growth, conjures up a response to the Ravitch Plan. It is partisan, to be sure, and offers little in the way of more than a topical salve to ease the State's financial woes.
Still, some points are well taken, and remedies -- though surely not of Albany's devise -- worthy of consideration, if not implementation.
The key to New York's financial salvation lies not so much in the obtuse or sublime. The solution is obvious, though decidedly painful, especially in a legislative election year.
Stop the spending. Raise income taxes. And cut, cut, cut. Ouch! [There. We said it. Then again, we're not running for public office...]
- - -
From the New York Post:
Beyond NY's gaps
By JOHN FASO
LT. Gov. Dick Ravitch yester day outlined a five-year financial-recovery plan to plug the state's immediate $9 billion budget hole and address its looming $60 billion structural deficit over the next half decade.
His two big fixes? More debt to finance current operating deficits, and a new body to oversee long-term budget cuts.
Both are flawed.
Ravitch proposed that the state issue up to $6 billion of new debt over the next three years -- 10 percent of the five-year structural deficit -- to help ease its path to fiscal health. And he envisioned the creation of a financial-review board, composed of five independent citizens, to make sure the state is cutting its massive structural deficit.
"It is not, in my judgment, possible to cut nine and a half billion dollars . . . out of this budget this coming year," Ravitch said yesterday. "Not only because I believe it to be a political impossibility, given the varied dispositions of the members of the Legislature. But because there is a level of cuts, no matter what everyone's politics are, [that] affects employment, it affects human beings."
But interest costs on the state's debt are already now about $5 billion a year and rising, so borrowing yet more is hardly a great idea. The state repeatedly has tried to borrow its way out of its problems -- most recently after 9/11 -- and also routinely has enacted counterproductive tax and fee increases, all on the promise that it would be the very last time that it would resort to such "emergency" measures.
The financial-review board would determine whether state spending or revenues are seriously out of whack, then authorize the governor to make automatic reductions in spending. But unlike the financial-control board that the state imposed upon a bankrupt New York City in the 1970s, this new board would be powerless to address one of the main cost-drivers killing the state's economy: public-employee contracts, pensions and benefit packages, and the state laws dictating these agreements.
Ravitch has performed a public service by again attempting to focus the attention of state officials and its citizenry on the fact that New York has been living beyond its means for many years. As he pointed out, the state has squandered federal stimulus money and didn't restrain spending and taxes, and our fiscal dilemma has only gotten worse. Surely, a more disciplined budget process would help New York establish spending priorities and lessen our dependence upon fiscal gimmicks and one-time revenues to balance budgets.
But the short- and long-term issue for New York isn't budget reform. Instead, New York needs a radical overhaul in state and local governance. Government needs to be consolidated, especially at the local and school-district levels, and costs need to be cut. In this time of economic travail, it is instructive that public employees statewide are projected to receive more than $2 billion in raises during 2010. Yet, the new Financial Review Board would have no authority to disapprove state-employee union contracts, much less have any role in the more expensive local ones.
Plus, many in Albany and around New York still haven't come to grips with the fact that New York is an economic basket case. Ravitch's report highlights the loss of population we've experienced and the over-reliance upon Wall Street as the engine of state tax revenue. But will people listen?
New York does have a way out, but the path won't be cleared by rearranging deck chairs. Instead, the state needs to embark upon a radically different, pro-growth strategy emphasizing private-sector job growth.
* Cutting taxes on businesses, both large and small.
* Streamlining environmental and zoning rules to encourage private investment and speedier permit approvals.
* Reducing the size and scope of government by consolidating services and functions.
* Eliminating borrowing that isn't approved by voters.
* Capping property taxes.
* Cutting health-insurance costs by eliminating state taxes on health insurance and allowing insurers to offer a greater variety of plans.
* Abolishing job-killing taxes on energy to help create jobs.
Simply put, we need to make New York a state where business and entrepreneurs create private-sector jobs.
Ravitch continues his long and admirable record of public service by highlighting the need for the state to reduce costs and restore fiscal stability over the next five years. But to truly restore New York and make it a place where people want to work and raise their families, we need policies to promote private-sector economic growth.
John Faso, the 2006 GOP can didate for governor, is a co- founder of New Yorkers for Growth.