Friday, April 23, 2010

Out Of The Blog Of A Local Councilman. . .

. . .Comes Talk Of "Effective Consolidation" And "Smart (even vertical) Development"

Could the winds of change be sweeping through the often hermetically-sealed hallways of Hempstead Town Hall?

Town of Hempstead Councilman, Ed Ambrosino, long a good friend of and an active participant in the community he serves, pens an eloquent blog on his website, where a recent entry caught our attention.

He blogs of maintaining quality services without the death knell of increasing taxes, at a time of a contracting tax base and shrinking revenues.

"Governments cannot maintain all services (the 'wants of the people') without finding additional revenue to fund the basket of wants," says Ambrosino. "Instead, we need to identify the needs, efficiently address the needs through municipal cooperation and effective consolidation and then find the revenue to fund the needs of the people."

Did he say "consolidation," the heretofore bane of Town Hall?

"We need to encourage smart development and go vertical where vertical is not antithetical to the essence of suburbia," declared the Councilman, long an advocate, as well as ardent fighter, for redefining the burbs as precursor to rebuilding suburbia.

Is there a shift at Town Hall away for the Levittownization of suburbia, where "think small" is the vision of a new myopia? Could the door be open to fresh, if not entirely grand, ideas, where, as Ed Ambrosino concludes, "we need to take political risk and stride with bold steps to save government from collapsing in a pile of financial chaos resulting from the pressure of political expediency."

Sure. These are only words.

Still, words preceed action, and knowing Ed Ambrosino as we do -- a man of his word -- we sense that the status quo is no longer quite as comfortable or sustainable at Town Hall as once presumed.

Change, it is said, must come from within. True of both the individual and of our cherished institutions.

It is quite possible that Ed Ambrosino, and folks just like him, commited to our community, represents just such change. We hope so, as the very future of Long Island depends on it.

Ed's a keeper, for certain.

"We need to charge the users of services without burdening the populace for the needs of the few."

Right you are, Ed. Let's hope the powers-that-be aren't intent on creating a special "salsa lessons" district.

The wave of the future, in Hempstead Town and across Long Island -- perhaps even all of New York -- may appear as a mere ripple. Like the tidal wave of a tsunami far off shore, the momentum is always forward, the awesome power and tremendous impact, just below the surface.
- - -
From edambrosino.com:

Getting What We Need From Our Government

You can't always get what you want
And if you try sometime you just might find
You get what you need

Who knew that Keith and Mick were writing the quintessential balancing test for government?

If only we would listen.

We can’t always get what we want. We cannot have brand new roads, beautiful parks, free health care, salsa lessons without an increase in governmental revenue. Something has to give.

When a municipality is growing, and vacant land is being converted to ratable property (such as homes, offices or stores) government's revenue increases without raising individual property taxes. When expansion ceases, the supply of revenue slows to a trickle.

At that point, government must cut back on services or find additional sources of revenue. Government’s divining rod points to one reliable, yet politically unpalatable, source of revenue: raising taxes.

Cutting services and raising taxes force us back to the words of Messrs. Jagger and Richards. We must decide what we need, and not just we want. As Thomas Jefferson so eloquently pointed out - servicing the needs of a constituency is the principal reason we have governments. “ That to secure [unalienable rights], governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

Governments cannot maintain all services (the “wants of the people”) without finding additional revenue to fund the basket of wants.

Instead, we need to identify the needs, efficiently address the needs through municipal cooperation and effective consolidation and then find the revenue to fund the needs of the people.

We need to encourage smart development and go vertical where vertical is not antithetical to the essence of suburbia.

We need to become energy intelligent and not depend on energy sources that are wasteful, redundant and inefficient.

We need to charge the users of services without burdening the populace for the needs of the few.

Lastly, we need to take political risk and stride with bold steps to save government from collapsing in a pile of financial chaos resulting from the pressure of political expediency.

Cherry Red should not be the color of our balance sheets.

It should be the color of Mr. Jimmy’s favorite flavor.

4 comments:

  1. Ed Ambrosino is by far the most progressive thinking member on Hempstead's Town Board. Whether it's smart development, consolidation, or transparency, Councilman Ambrosino just gets it. It may be because he's the youngest of all the Town Board members, but I would hope age would not change his thoughts and beliefs all that much.

    Unfortunately, the deck is stacked against him at Hempstead Town Hall with Board members still stuck in the Long Island of the 1950's. Kate Murray prefers the sprawl and blight of Hempstead Turnpike, and Anthony Santino believes Long Islanders enjoy paying more for their municipal services.

    If we could just bring in a new Supervisor and a few new Board members to Ed's way of thinking, imagine how much better this Town would be!

    ReplyDelete
  2. You left-leaning, Democrat-coddling, GOP-bashing blogger... er, ah, wait a minute. Ambrosino's a Republican, isn't he?

    Never mind...

    He is one of the good guys. And this post goes to show that it's not left of center that matters, but right on the issues that matter to the people.

    Just think, if we had a progressive thinker like Ed Ambrosino as Supervisor, and not that regressive throwback to 1950 Levittown, Elmont would have its supermarket, Baldwin its revitalized Grand Avenue, West Hempstead its transit-oriented housing, and Nassau its Lighthouse.

    Look around the town, folks. Tell me what you see...

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a reminder that when it comes to local government, what voters want more than anything is high-quality municipal services delivered cost-effectively. Political parties mean less than actual performance. Right now Hempstead is going the wrong way - crummy roads, an abysmal land use and zoning environment, and a town government that seems to believe that the most important service it can provide to its constituents is to create new and innovative ways for property owners to pay their extraordinary taxes.

    A guy like Ambrosino truly sounds like a breath of fresh air - how he can rise above the kind of institutional inertia now prevalent in Hempstead is less clear.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As I have mentioned in my earlier blogs from the past weeks, we new NEW BLOOD, NEW IDEAS AND VIBRANT POLITICIANS - NOT KATE- THE FAT-MURRAY. It just shows all of us, we as normal citizens with open minds, can make a simple logical observance - why can't the TOH make logical decisions!!! The LightHouse Project is shifting to Queens and the Casino idea is DOA. Why does Ed (Mango)Mangano even put his nose in there - Thats just stupid!!! TOH & County can'tr make a simple economic development decision fior the LightHouse Project, what will make me think a Casino - it shows they continue to sleep at the wheel. In order for NC to become a nice place to live, work etc... we need Mike Bloomberg - A true politician that continues to make NYC even better. Lets make NC the SIXTH Borough...

    ReplyDelete